<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: IMAX is Awesome &#8211; Except When They Lie	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.gregtodiffer.com/imax-is-awesome-except-when-they-lie/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.gregtodiffer.com/imax-is-awesome-except-when-they-lie/</link>
	<description>Stories, rants &#38; observations about expat life in Asia&#039;s craziest city</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2016 15:48:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.6.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Greg		</title>
		<link>https://www.gregtodiffer.com/imax-is-awesome-except-when-they-lie/#comment-280</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Greg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 03:28:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gregtodiffer.dreamhosters.com/?p=119#comment-280</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Well, I should have mentioned in the post that the IMAX Digital screens do use two 2K projectors, so the resolution is pretty badass, and probably looks great. But the main point I wanted to get across was that IMAX has spent millions of dollars and years of PR to condition the public that IMAX=HUGE SCREEN. Some of the comments on the stories I linked to above were from angry people who felt they were tricked into paying more for a movie they thought was going to be on a huge IMAX screen. I&#039;d be pissed too.&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I should have mentioned in the post that the IMAX Digital screens do use two 2K projectors, so the resolution is pretty badass, and probably looks great. But the main point I wanted to get across was that IMAX has spent millions of dollars and years of PR to condition the public that IMAX=HUGE SCREEN. Some of the comments on the stories I linked to above were from angry people who felt they were tricked into paying more for a movie they thought was going to be on a huge IMAX screen. I&#8217;d be pissed too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: ruxoz		</title>
		<link>https://www.gregtodiffer.com/imax-is-awesome-except-when-they-lie/#comment-279</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ruxoz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 03:23:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gregtodiffer.dreamhosters.com/?p=119#comment-279</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;@4amexpat I disagree.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It may be simply considering that pixels does matter, but actually human eyes&#039; limit does too.  With small screen, I think we can miss some detail easier than a bigger one. Anyway, I don&#039;t know whether IMAX really has done a research or just made their own words.. :/&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@4amexpat I disagree.</p>
</p>
<p>It may be simply considering that pixels does matter, but actually human eyes&#8217; limit does too.  With small screen, I think we can miss some detail easier than a bigger one. Anyway, I don&#8217;t know whether IMAX really has done a research or just made their own words.. :/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: 4amexpat		</title>
		<link>https://www.gregtodiffer.com/imax-is-awesome-except-when-they-lie/#comment-278</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[4amexpat]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 15:00:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gregtodiffer.dreamhosters.com/?p=119#comment-278</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;Big is good, but so is resolution. I would think resolution has more to do with enjoyment of a detailed movie like Avatar.  If the 57 foot screen has the same amount of pixels as the 97 food screen - you are seeing the exact same thing, just different sized dots.  There may be something awe inspiring about walking in to a massive screen, in a massive room, but that may be a seperate experience.&lt;/p&gt;
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Big is good, but so is resolution. I would think resolution has more to do with enjoyment of a detailed movie like Avatar.  If the 57 foot screen has the same amount of pixels as the 97 food screen &#8211; you are seeing the exact same thing, just different sized dots.  There may be something awe inspiring about walking in to a massive screen, in a massive room, but that may be a seperate experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
